White Cis Fat Queer Woman

I enjoy Doctor Who and people with privilege not being fucking awful. My blog will be full of both these things, as well as pictures of cats. I also run a fat-positive health blog.

Feel free to come to my askbox! Just know I keep anonymous off because nothing makes trolls more angry than not being able to hide behind greyface. But if I fuck up, you can absolutely call me on it. I will apologize and strive not to do it again.

 

lgbtlaughs:

One Ohio Christian [troll?] is not happy at all that Ohioans are nicknamed ‘Buckeyes’ or that Ohio State has a team by that name, and believes the state’s tree is unfit to represent him.
Why? Because it’s bisexual.
Writes Jim Flechtner to The Courier:

SO WHAT ABOUT CARNATIONS?Something in the “Just Ask” column (Page A3, May 29) disturbed me. According to the column, “the Ohio buckeye, Aesculus glabra, bears flowers with both male and female organs on the same tree. It is a monoecious species.”I couldn’t believe this, so I did some research and, sure enough, a science website (forestry.about.com) states that “the Ohio buckeye is polygamo-monoecious, bearing both bisexual and male flowers.”The buckeye is our state tree and most of us gladly wear the nickname, “buckeyes.” But it is shameful and unacceptable that a bisexual tree should represent us! We are flaunting the Holy Bible!I urge everyone to contact their state representative and demand legislation removing the buckeye as our state tree and condemning the use of the term “buckeye” as a nickname for residents of Ohio.Does anyone know if carnations are bisexual?Jim Flechtner, Findlay

[story: towleroad, image: dave’s garden]

And suddenly, I love my state tree!

lgbtlaughs:

One Ohio Christian [troll?] is not happy at all that Ohioans are nicknamed ‘Buckeyes’ or that Ohio State has a team by that name, and believes the state’s tree is unfit to represent him.

Why? Because it’s bisexual.

Writes Jim Flechtner to The Courier:

SO WHAT ABOUT CARNATIONS?

Something in the “Just Ask” column (Page A3, May 29) disturbed me. According to the column, “the Ohio buckeye, Aesculus glabra, bears flowers with both male and female organs on the same tree. It is a monoecious species.”

I couldn’t believe this, so I did some research and, sure enough, a science website (forestry.about.com) states that “the Ohio buckeye is polygamo-monoecious, bearing both bisexual and male flowers.”

The buckeye is our state tree and most of us gladly wear the nickname, “buckeyes.” But it is shameful and unacceptable that a bisexual tree should represent us! We are flaunting the Holy Bible!

I urge everyone to contact their state representative and demand legislation removing the buckeye as our state tree and condemning the use of the term “buckeye” as a nickname for residents of Ohio.

Does anyone know if carnations are bisexual?

Jim Flechtner, Findlay

[story: towleroad, image: dave’s garden]

And suddenly, I love my state tree!

  1. i-am-not-the-girl-next-door reblogged this from thesunnysideofbeingbi and added:
    OH. MY. GOD. This is from my area of Ohio’s newspaper. This dude is from a town that’s only 20 minutes away from me. I...
  2. thesunnysideofbeingbi reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  3. amazingkkisnotonfire reblogged this from anklegators
  4. anklegators reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  5. manga-nerd reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  6. starfare reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  7. rampagingpixie reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  8. mutedmirth reblogged this from nightshadetea and added:
    Does anyone know of any plant that only has one reproductive ‘organ’? I mean, maybe he should stop eating fruit and veg...
  9. nightshadetea reblogged this from lgbtlaughs and added:
    I. Whu. Wait WHAT?! I can’t even break out the science right now. This hurts too much.
  10. osubuckeyes reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  11. ramblings-of-a-madman reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  12. tongue2slur2 reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  13. mienfu reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  14. scottyisarabbit reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  15. photocyte reblogged this from lgbtlaughs and added:
    I don’t get it… if his god made all living things, he made the tree reproduce like that. This is why I don’t read...
  16. angeladellamuerta reblogged this from o3k64
  17. octopusofobservation reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  18. hufflemypuff reblogged this from casuallydressedandindistress
  19. mybookoflove reblogged this from herrashmoo
  20. casuallydressedandindistress reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  21. frankcoffee reblogged this from lgbtlaughs and added:
    brb dying
  22. utahoshi-kengo reblogged this from princessnaphthalene and added:
    … what even.
  23. blueisacolour reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  24. sirtwigbelly reblogged this from kablizzy
  25. ebonrune reblogged this from lgbtlaughs and added:
    Correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t most plants bisexual/hermaphroditic?
  26. aintlifelovely reblogged this from chillyscientist
  27. chillyscientist reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  28. formlessforce reblogged this from kablizzy and added:
    Speaking as an Ohio Christian this is so stupid it’s funny
  29. kablizzy reblogged this from nightsinwonderland and added:
    I’m just kinda reblog this, ‘cause there’s, like, nothing to add.
  30. fleursdartifice reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  31. nubpher reblogged this from urawrd
  32. urawrd reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  33. pussy-facials reblogged this from lgbtlaughs
  34. arkeiryn reblogged this from lgbtlaughs